Currently, the list of Dataverse features can be found at https://dataverse.org/software-features
We aren't great about keeping it up-to-date.
What if we move this list into the guides? :thinking:
Good idea? Bad idea? What do you think?
Good idea for me, it would be easier to update it in the PR if in the guides
Ok, great, but where in the guides?
Maybe we need to start listing items that are missing? Then when we have an overview, we can figure out where to put each seperately or if there's perhaps a need to bundle for an "intro/general/software info/about" section or something of the sort.
Sure, sound good. I just created a tab called "add missing features" to the spreadsheet we've been using: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1EIFGAfDfZAboFa3_ShRfgoT6xSDpKohDH2_iCyO5MtA/edit?usp=sharing
Please request access and add away!
@Philip Durbin did you let Dwayne and Emily know you are working on this here? Given they have to get this list together for the CHAT AI Steno requested? Maybe they should help here?
@Sonia Barbosa I did talk to @Dwayne Liburd the other day about the current list of features and he introduced me to Carla who I think is working on this.
This "list of features" thread in #docs is just something I've wondered about for a long time.
We moved https://dataverse.org/integrations into the guides and it has worked quite well for keeping it up to date.
At our monthly meeting on Wednesday I asked about this again and go the go ahead. So I'll create an issue about moving the list of features into the guides.
I created the issue about moving the list of features to the guides: #11998
I just made a pull request at #12000 to do the very minimum, which is to copy the list over, as is.
You can preview it here: https://dataverse-guide--12000.org.readthedocs.build/en/12000/admin/features.html
@Dieuwertje Bloemen @Vaida PlankytΔ π¨ I put it under the Admin Guide, like we talked about.
Great comment by @Julian Gautier about work he and @Dwayne Liburd did a while back to categorize the features, which lives on in our brochure for Harvard Dataverse: https://github.com/IQSS/dataverse/issues/11998#issuecomment-3571555917
Thanks. I'd say this is work folks at IQSS did, which informed how features were described and organized on that brochure
Gotcha. Credit where credit is due!
We're targeting an admin audience, the Admin Guide. What's the audience for the brochure?
I'd say the audience is for people wanting to use Harvard Dataverse for publishing and finding data. @Sonia Barbosa takes the brochure to conferences and meetings where those types of folks might be interested
Ok, sounds like authors and downloaders, mostly. Thanks.
Yeah and ppl managing collections, so like curators, and other data support folks
Got it. Thanks.
In the Admin Guide we also want to cover people who care about lower level stuff like OIDC for auth.
I just presented the categorized list of features (#12011) to @Ceilyn Boyd @Sonia Barbosa and @Dwayne Liburd and they all like where we're going.
Dwayne already has a mockup of a future dataverse.org homepage that includes a few cards showing top features. The plan is to link from there to the list of features in the guides we're working on.
And from the list of features in the guides, we will link back to https://dataverse.org/software-features which will have a nicer looking summary of features instead of the current brain dump.
This new issue is about related design work: https://github.com/IQSS/dataverse-pm/issues/498
I went ahead and merged the categorized list of features (#12011) into the main pull request (#12000). I showed it at tech hours last week and there were no objections.
I just created a doc where we can jot down our ideas of features that should be added to the new features list: https://docs.google.com/document/d/10RIvsUntk9vbCofpic-ld-yrfko3sUvH8uH4eqqfYco/edit?usp=sharing
Please feel free to edit!
Last updated: Jan 09 2026 at 14:18 UTC