Currently, the list of Dataverse features can be found at https://dataverse.org/software-features
We aren't great about keeping it up-to-date.
What if we move this list into the guides? :thinking:
Good idea? Bad idea? What do you think?
Good idea for me, it would be easier to update it in the PR if in the guides
Ok, great, but where in the guides?
Maybe we need to start listing items that are missing? Then when we have an overview, we can figure out where to put each seperately or if there's perhaps a need to bundle for an "intro/general/software info/about" section or something of the sort.
Sure, sound good. I just created a tab called "add missing features" to the spreadsheet we've been using: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1EIFGAfDfZAboFa3_ShRfgoT6xSDpKohDH2_iCyO5MtA/edit?usp=sharing
Please request access and add away!
@Philip Durbin did you let Dwayne and Emily know you are working on this here? Given they have to get this list together for the CHAT AI Steno requested? Maybe they should help here?
@Sonia Barbosa I did talk to @Dwayne Liburd the other day about the current list of features and he introduced me to Carla who I think is working on this.
This "list of features" thread in #docs is just something I've wondered about for a long time.
We moved https://dataverse.org/integrations into the guides and it has worked quite well for keeping it up to date.
At our monthly meeting on Wednesday I asked about this again and go the go ahead. So I'll create an issue about moving the list of features into the guides.
I created the issue about moving the list of features to the guides: #11998
I just made a pull request at #12000 to do the very minimum, which is to copy the list over, as is.
You can preview it here: https://dataverse-guide--12000.org.readthedocs.build/en/12000/admin/features.html
@Dieuwertje Bloemen @Vaida PlankytΔ π¨ I put it under the Admin Guide, like we talked about.
Great comment by @Julian Gautier about work he and @Dwayne Liburd did a while back to categorize the features, which lives on in our brochure for Harvard Dataverse: https://github.com/IQSS/dataverse/issues/11998#issuecomment-3571555917
Thanks. I'd say this is work folks at IQSS did, which informed how features were described and organized on that brochure
Gotcha. Credit where credit is due!
We're targeting an admin audience, the Admin Guide. What's the audience for the brochure?
I'd say the audience is for people wanting to use Harvard Dataverse for publishing and finding data. @Sonia Barbosa takes the brochure to conferences and meetings where those types of folks might be interested
Ok, sounds like authors and downloaders, mostly. Thanks.
Yeah and ppl managing collections, so like curators, and other data support folks
Got it. Thanks.
In the Admin Guide we also want to cover people who care about lower level stuff like OIDC for auth.
I just presented the categorized list of features (#12011) to @Ceilyn Boyd @Sonia Barbosa and @Dwayne Liburd and they all like where we're going.
Dwayne already has a mockup of a future dataverse.org homepage that includes a few cards showing top features. The plan is to link from there to the list of features in the guides we're working on.
And from the list of features in the guides, we will link back to https://dataverse.org/software-features which will have a nicer looking summary of features instead of the current brain dump.
This new issue is about related design work: https://github.com/IQSS/dataverse-pm/issues/498
I went ahead and merged the categorized list of features (#12011) into the main pull request (#12000). I showed it at tech hours last week and there were no objections.
I just created a doc where we can jot down our ideas of features that should be added to the new features list: https://docs.google.com/document/d/10RIvsUntk9vbCofpic-ld-yrfko3sUvH8uH4eqqfYco/edit?usp=sharing
Please feel free to edit!
Hmm, we should probably add more geospatial features to the list.
@Philip Durbin π are you referring to the Borealis Geospatial work? not to hog the thread, but i was curious how that aligns with the DataCite geolocation schema, and whether this'll become the agreed upon implementation for a geospatial field :smile:
Yes! In @Amber Leahey's talk (#geospatial > Expanded geospatial metadata block - Feb 3 Community Call) she mentioned that upcoming work as well as existing features such as the geospatial metadata block itself and special handling of some geospatial files (GeoJSON, GeoTIFF, Shapefile, NetCDF): https://guides.dataverse.org/en/6.9/user/dataset-management.html#geojson (and below).
ooh, thank you for those links! :smile:
@Dieuwertje Bloemen and I just made a lot of progress! Here's the commit and the preview: https://dataverse-guide--12000.org.readthedocs.build/en/12000/admin/features.html
Still very much a work in progress, but we're getting there. Again, this is the spreadsheet we're editing, the "Next/2026" tab: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1EIFGAfDfZAboFa3_ShRfgoT6xSDpKohDH2_iCyO5MtA/edit?gid=729532473#gid=729532473
Then we run this to update the page:
curl -L "https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1EIFGAfDfZAboFa3_ShRfgoT6xSDpKohDH2_iCyO5MtA/export?gid=729532473&format=tsv" | python3 ../../scripts/issues/11998/tsv2md.py > source/admin/features.md
Don't look now, but may be a nice layout option: https://sphinx-design.readthedocs.io/en/furo-theme/grids.html
Huh, looks nice, but we'd have to switch the theme for the whole site, right?
I'd say let's try without changing the theme. It's an extension.
Could you maybe make a new branch off of https://github.com/IQSS/dataverse/tree/11998-features-in-guides and show us what you have in mind?
I just added a few more features and descriptions in https://github.com/IQSS/dataverse/pull/12000/changes/6632334b3278b88495f889140a9461f750b45457
Here's the preview: https://dataverse-guide--12000.org.readthedocs.build/en/12000/admin/features.html
looks great!
@Dieuwertje Bloemen @AmΓ©lie Fiocca great progress today! I just pushed our changes: https://dataverse-guide--12000.org.readthedocs.build/en/12000/admin/features.html
As a reminder for next time, we were working on the "integrations" category.
For anyone else looking at the list, yes we know we added an empty "highlights" section at the top and some "misc" stuff at the bottom. We'll continue to iterate next time. All are welcome! See #docs > doc group meeting
Ahhh... AI is great for stuff like this:
![]()
@Dieuwertje Bloemen @Alyssa Conlon @Vaida PlankytΔ π¨ @Parth karalkar great, productive meeting today! Thanks!
The pull request is ready for review! Move the list of features into the guides #12000
I hate to say this. But that page is terrible.
It's a huge wall of text, really hard to parse and really hard to comprehend
May I suggest something?
(I couldn't make to todays meeting, had to take care of kids)
@Oliver Bertuch please!
https://sphinx-design.readthedocs.io/en/furo-theme/cards.html
Let me cook up a quick example
My favorite part of the page is the table of contents, I must admit. :sweat_smile:
![]()
Here's an example of how using cards in a grid can look like
We can add more eye candy like symbols to every card's title
Have a nice picture for the first card
interesting
@Dieuwertje Bloemen @Vaida PlankytΔ π¨ @Alyssa Conlon what do you think?
Do you want me to create a PR into your PR, so we get a browseable preview of this?
@Oliver Bertuch yes please!
Coming right up
Thanks so much. We went 25 minutes over today. I'm somewhat desperate to just get anything merged. I was thinking we could get fancier in the future but if you can help us get fancier now, great!
Sorry!
It really felt like a mistake to merge this as is.
Oh, it's fine. No one was kept against their will. :smile:
https://dataverse-guide--12460.org.readthedocs.build/en/12460/admin/features.html
Interesting. So you're thinking we should get rid of the table of contents? My favorite part! :sweat_smile:
Anyway to preview the sections with more content? I'm wondering if it's look too much for 10+ tiles?
I can reshape one of those, just a sec
Philip Durbin π said:
Interesting. So you're thinking we should get rid of the table of contents? My favorite part! :sweat_smile:
I'm not saying let's get rid of it, but it bothered me while hacking on it. It got in the way.
That said... Looking at https://zammad.com/en/product/features or https://www.jetbrains.com/idea/features/#intellij-idea-features it's not always necessary to have a TOC. I'm not yet sure how to make the TOC reappear, the h2 in the cards are not parsed as TOC.
Alyssa Conlon said:
Anyway to preview the sections with more content? I'm wondering if it's look too much for 10+ tiles?
Integrations has 11 points and is the longest, I'll reshape that.
@Alyssa Conlon @Philip Durbin π pushed just now. Converted an additional section (interop) to have something "after" the largest section to look at as well.
Build is done, take a look! https://dataverse-guide--12460.org.readthedocs.build/en/12460/admin/features.html
sorry, doing a millions things! :sweat_smile:
Please play around with the grid options. The cards can, for example, be made take up more space:
![]()
I think that looks a bit better, with the title of the section not as a tile, it feels less crowded
Do you want me to commit this?
Looks a little squished on mobile:
![]()
Can the cards be responsive? Maybe only one card at a time on mobile?
Yes.
Do you want me to do that?
Also, should I make all the "intro cards" appear as headers?
If you don't mind! And yeah, I think I titles at the top looks a bit better.
Do y'all want me to just convert the whole thing?
It's your branch! :smile:
Bah I just don't want to do too much tedious work if y'all think this is a bad idea / doesn't work
maybe AI can do it :robot:
After all, we want to improve readability and such
Longer term we probably want some nice images to spice things up. :chili_pepper:
So it isn't a wall of text. :wall:
Absolutely!
See how Jetbrains does this in their Feature list?
The reason I like the table of contents is that you can quickly scan it without seeing the details.
You can think "do these headings speak to me or not?"
And decide which one, if any, to click on, to learn more.
Now, I recognize that what's below the table of contents (in the PR from this morning) is not very pretty.
I'm just wondering if we can still have some scanability. :thinking:
I just pushed the converted, responsive document
For TOCs to work, any h2 must be at the root of the doctree, any nested h2 will not show up.
I can't make "hidden" h2s. :sad:
So we might need to create a manual TOC...
But maybe that's OK? Let me see if I can get something going that also helps with linking to the user guide.
This is how it looks on my phone:
![]()
Huh?????
That's very strange
Are you sure you are looking at the latest build?
Actually I see that the build must have fallen through!
Bah RTD timed out
Let me trigger the build again
That's much better! https://dataverse-guide--12460.org.readthedocs.build/en/12460/admin/features.html
Nice!
![]()
You found icons for everything?!? :mind:
It wasn't that hard...
You know, maybe we don't need the table of contents after all. Less is more!
Gimme a sec. About to push that.
Done. https://dataverse-guide--12460.org.readthedocs.build/en/12460/admin/features.html
Nice. And it doesn't look like too much manual effort to keep the table of contents up to date.
Unfortunately I cannot manipulate the TOC to include the stuff automatically. Not sure how often we are going to alter the categories, so you're probably right.
It might be nice to add more cards to have a concise block layout :see_no_evil: Optimizations for later...
@Alyssa Conlon @Vaida PlankytΔ π¨ @Dieuwertje Bloemen what do y'all think?
Ha. I see a :star_struck: from @AmΓ©lie Fiocca
@Dieuwertje Bloemen @Vaida PlankytΔ π¨ @Alyssa Conlon what do you think?
(I'm asking because code freeze is today and I'm thinking about merging it!)
@Oliver Bertuch my only feedback is that I might remove some of the explanatory text at the top about using links and scrolling.
We're talking about this text, right?
This page highlights features for administrators and power-users of a Dataverse installation. Use the links below to jump to a category, or scroll through all the feature cards.
The rationale behind me adding this short introduction was my attempt at putting myself in the shoes of someone new to Dataverse. They might appreciate a classification of the content and how it's intended to work if they landed on the page from somewhere else. If y'all feel like this is superfluous, ditch it!
A little intro like this is good. The shorter the better. I think it's seeing the term "feature cards" that bothers me a bit. People don't care that Sphinx calls these things cards. :smile:
Anyway, it's a minor point. Something I'm happy to tweak a bit before it's merged.
I think the term "cards" is increasingly used these days. There are now model cards, score cards and I think I've seen "feature card" in other contexts as well. But sure, adapt as you see fit!
Looks good to me! I like how the categories at the top are a bit more concise than the entire ToC.
@Oliver Bertuch here's my suggestion: https://github.com/IQSS/dataverse/pull/12460#pullrequestreview-4497617936
Also, your PR is still in draft.
Oh yeah I did a draft because I wasn't sure y'all like it.
Let me fix that right away
Commited and "ready for review" :wink:
Please note: this is a PR to your PR :sweat_smile:
So could also just commit to the branch :wink:
Merged! All of it! We'll have our list of features in the guides for 6.11! :tada:
For now, you can preview it at https://preview.guides.gdcc.io/en/develop/admin/features.html (linked from the versions page).
Thanks for all the hard work everyone! Especially @Dieuwertje Bloemen @Vaida PlankytΔ π¨ @Alyssa Conlon and @Oliver Bertuch!
No cards in the PDF but it still looks fine to me:
![]()
We can still optimize that, if we really think the PDF is important to anyone...
Meh, again, the PDF looks fine to me!
looks great, thanks for your work on this @Oliver Bertuch ! :muscle:
Thank y'all for putting together the content! I only did some styling.
Yes, the styling is very nice.
How should we talk about the list of features in the 6.11 release notes?
As of this writing in https://github.com/IQSS/dataverse/blob/12283-6.11-release-notes/doc/release-notes/6.11-release-notes.md (PR #12475) I have it pretty low down under "Other Changes" like this:
But maybe we could move it up some? I'm not sure it should rise to the level of a highlight though.
I could add a bit more about the "why". That we want to maintain the list in git and that the community can help, if they wish.
Oh, that reminds me, should Locally FAIR Data be included on the list of features? Here's what I put in the draft of the 6.11 release notes above:
This release includes experimental support for "Locally FAIR" data. When enabled, this feature allows publication of content that will only be visible to authorized users or groups within a Dataverse installation. User without authorization will not see the Locally FAIR collections, datasets, or files in search results and cannot visit their pages or access them via the Dataverse API.
For more information, see Locally FAIR Data in the guides and #12319.
(We haven't built the 6.11 guides yet but you can preview that content at https://preview.guides.gdcc.io/en/develop/user/dataverse-management.html#locally-fair )
i agree that adding a bit about the why (easier maintaining and visibility) would be great! :blush:
I also don't think it should be a highlight in the release notes if I look at the rest. Regarding the 'why', I would definitely explain it a bit, and that we went through every feature to ensure relevance. Otherwise, it might just seem like a copy.
For locally FAIR: I would say "not right now". I think we kept any features with experimental support out of the list, if I remember correctly (could definitely be wrong). But once it's not longer considered experimental, I think we should for sure add it in there.
Make sense! Thanks!
Ok, I hope this is a little better:
Our lovely list of features is in the 6.11 guides: https://guides.dataverse.org/en/6.11/admin/features.html
I just announced how I updated https://dataverse.org/software-features to point to the updated version in the guides.
Last updated: Aug 18 2026 at 08:27 UTC