I had a different question, but deleted it. I see the issues related to dc:type and dc:date fields and noticed that dc:rights was discussed. So is it in the plan to eventually include dc:rights in the oai_dc feed? We are trying to figure out a way to designate records as not open access, or restricted just to asu affiliates so that the feed to Primo can recognize it and also mark them that way. I think Primo requires the oai_dc format. Is there a way to add the dc:rights field to the oai_dc feed manually in the dataverse code?
Hi @Deirdre Kirmis,
We have changed the oai dc:rights output in e-cienciaDatos. You can check it here: https://edatos.consorciomadrono.es/oai?verb=ListRecords&metadataPrefix=oai_dc
Our implementation is based in Dataverse v6.5, you can find the differences with the IQSS implementation here: https://github.com/IQSS/dataverse/compare/v6.5...Consorcio-Madrono:dataverse:v6.5Madrono
dc:rights changes are in the file DublinCoreExportUtil.java. Searching "rigths" in this file you can find our changes.
The information about closed / open access is copied from the oai_datacite oai output, but in this case is automatic, not manual.
This is awesome .. thank you for sharing! That is exactly what we need. We may want to do a similar thing for now, although I'm hoping eventually it will be added back as part of the default feed.
Do you have any records in the repo that are marked as "closedAccess" or "restrictedAccess"? Just want to see how the feed looks.
We only have some datasets with embargoed files that are shown as "restrictedAccess". Here is an example: https://edatos.consorciomadrono.es/oai?verb=GetRecord&metadataPrefix=oai_dc&identifier=doi:10.21950/3XF0IT
Perfect! Thank you!
Over at https://github.com/IQSS/dataverse/issues/5920#issuecomment-2339072490 I mentioned some unfinished dc:rights work that needs to be done.
@Juan please feel free to make a pull request. :big_smile:
Basically, I started working on dc:rights but backed out my changes when it got tricky.
@Philip Durbin โ๏ธ , sorry for the delay in the response, It was a little dark yesterday: https://edition.cnn.com/2025/04/28/europe/spain-portugal-power-outages-intl/index.html .
I am not sure that our approach is the best one for the general case. I think that for the dc metadata, it could be better to either:
What do you think? I can create a pull request with our current approach or any of the alternatives above.
@Julian Gautier and @Philipp Conzett are active on #5920. I'd like to hear what they think. Thanks for being willing to create a pull request! :heart:
Hey all. @Philip Durbin โ๏ธ thanks for the ping. I'd say I was active on #5920 but haven't been in a while and can't refocus on it for now. Too many other projects :sweat_smile:
real
Last updated: Oct 30 2025 at 06:21 UTC