configbaker:6.12-noble missing after release · containers

Stream: containers

Topic: configbaker:6.12-noble missing after release

Philip Durbin 🚀 (Oct 02 2026 at 13:29):

@Oliver Bertuch I left a comment asking about this:

# Build the application image, but skip the configbaker image (that's a different job)!

Not just for #12772 but because in #12746 I'm also modifying code beneath that comment.

Please see https://github.com/IQSS/dataverse/pull/12772#discussion_r4166104786

Philip Durbin 🚀 (Oct 02 2026 at 13:59):

@Oliver Bertuch I'm so confused. In https://github.com/IQSS/dataverse/pull/12772#discussion_r4166333927 you seem to be saying the opposite of what the comment says.

I mean, you seem happy with the comment. You don't want to change it. That's fine. Maybe I should just merge the PR. But I'm very confused. :sweat_smile:

Oliver Bertuch (Oct 02 2026 at 14:03):

Yeah my bad! This is a typo! :zany:

Oliver Bertuch (Oct 02 2026 at 14:05):

I left a suggestion :see_no_evil:

Philip Durbin 🚀 (Oct 02 2026 at 14:09):

Cool. Will it break your patch, though?

Philip Durbin 🚀 (Oct 02 2026 at 14:10):

Please feel free to commit the change. And fix the patch, if necessary.

Oliver Bertuch (Oct 02 2026 at 14:10):

You mean the backport? No. That patch is applied to the version of the file as contained in the 6.12 tag.

Philip Durbin 🚀 (Oct 02 2026 at 14:10):

Ah, ok.

Philip Durbin 🚀 (Oct 02 2026 at 14:10):

You commit. I merge.

Philip Durbin 🚀 (Oct 02 2026 at 14:11):

I don't think we need to wait for tests to pass. The only change is to a comment.

Oliver Bertuch (Oct 02 2026 at 14:13):

Done! :check:

Philip Durbin 🚀 (Oct 02 2026 at 14:16):

Merged! :rocket:

Now what? Run the maintenance job? :thinking: Will that create the configbaker:6.12-noble image?

Oliver Bertuch (Oct 02 2026 at 14:32):

Just tried that in damp mode. I did forget the detail of having to put backports for configbaker at /modules/container-configbaker/backports/

Oliver Bertuch (Oct 02 2026 at 14:32):

Stupid me...

Philip Durbin 🚀 (Oct 02 2026 at 14:32):

Another PR to make and merge, then?

Oliver Bertuch (Oct 02 2026 at 14:33):

Should be a quick one. Will test by using the branch option of the action.

Philip Durbin 🚀 (Oct 02 2026 at 14:33):

Oliver Bertuch (Oct 02 2026 at 14:36):

Sorry for the inconvinience :face_with_peeking_eye:

Philip Durbin 🚀 (Oct 02 2026 at 14:39):

No worries. It's GitHub Actions. It's expected!

Oliver Bertuch (Oct 02 2026 at 14:41):

That's what I wanna see

Philip Durbin 🚀 (Oct 02 2026 at 14:42):

Oliver Bertuch (Oct 02 2026 at 14:44):

https://github.com/IQSS/dataverse/pull/12776

Philip Durbin 🚀 (Oct 02 2026 at 14:45):

Merged. I trust you. :smile:

Oliver Bertuch (Oct 02 2026 at 14:46):

I can put the link to the action run here if that helps...?

Oliver Bertuch (Oct 02 2026 at 14:47):

Running the maintenance action now! (In normal, non-dry, non-damp mode. https://github.com/IQSS/dataverse/actions/runs/37022260665)

Philip Durbin 🚀 (Oct 02 2026 at 14:48):

:popcorn:

Oliver Bertuch (Oct 02 2026 at 15:03):

I see tags on Docker Hub. All done here!

Philip Durbin 🚀 (Oct 02 2026 at 15:05):

Same. I put a screenshot here: https://github.com/IQSS/dataverse/issues/12761#issuecomment-5955261889

Philip Durbin 🚀 (Oct 02 2026 at 15:06):

Should we talk in this topic about how my testing failed to discover the missing configbaker image?

Or should we create a new topic?

Oliver Bertuch (Oct 02 2026 at 15:07):

Dunno. The whole process is a mess. But what we do is also complicated in general. So I don't blame you. I should have run the maintenance script in damp mode myself. Maybe we can add that to the CI workflow, making sure such things get noticed.

Oliver Bertuch (Oct 02 2026 at 15:08):

On the other hand: maybe it's time to really start thinking about branching off the whole images business. That's certainly not a topic for this thread.