Do Dataverse datasets have a notion of open access/closed access?
Zenodo records for example have a access_right field, which can be open, embargoed, restricted or closed.
Currently the closest I could find are license and termsOfUse, although the values are not from a controlled vocabulary.
Hi! Yes, Dataverse has the same concepts. Just yesterday I was rediscovering how to get the embargo status of a file via API: #community > Retrieve Files Embargo status for API :sweat_smile:
The default license is CC0, which I assume qualifies as open access.
Installations of Dataverse can add as many licenses as they want. @Philipp Conzett helped make that feature happen.
Restricted is at the file level. If you go to Harvard Dataverse and click the "Files" facet, you'll see a facet called "Access" that shows which files are public, restricted, or embargoed: https://dataverse.harvard.edu/dataverse/harvard?q=&types=files
Possibly one could then declare a dataset as "open access" when the dataset has a CC0 license and all files are public
Sure, that makes sense. Are you thinking there would be a badge? Or a search facet to click? Or both, or other ideas? :big_smile:
Some kind of badge, e.g. like Zenodo does it https://zenodo.org/record/3958960 , could indeed be useful as an indicator for a user and to promote open access/open science.
So, just a little green badge, like this? That doesn't sound too hard. :big_smile:
Screen-Shot-2023-09-21-at-1.56.55-PM.png
The badge isn't even clickable.
I guess the main things are deciding what the rules are, when you get the badge. Like you said CC0 license and public files, would be a good starting point. That's the default for Dataverse anyway.
@Stefan Ollinger if you want, please feel free to create an issue, a feature request, for this: https://github.com/IQSS/dataverse/issues
@Philip Durbin done: https://github.com/IQSS/dataverse/issues/9943 :smile:
Thanks!
Last updated: Nov 01 2025 at 14:11 UTC