for discussion on integrating the DataCite Usage Tracker (currently in beta)
@Don Sizemore thanks for posting this, glad to see interest from the Dataverse community! We are rolling out slowly with a small number of beta testers and gathering feedback on the service. From our call today, it sounds like the approach of embedding a Javascript snippet on landing/download pages might not immediately work for Dataverse installations, which is very helpful feedback for us to consider for future iterations :smile:
@Kelly Stathis yes, that's my understanding. Together, we'll figure it out. :happy:
Someone just asked about MDC in #dataverse on Matrix. I pointed them to this thread. I figured we should also link to the new tracker: https://github.com/datacite/datacite-tracker
In this Using the DataCite MDC Tracker with Dataverse, we (Jim, mostly) talk about how the usage tracker probably won't "just work" with Dataverse without modifications.
Thank you for the sharing. From what I understand, the MDC beta tracker does not display citations? only views and downloads?
Will the current installation still be necessary? We're wondering whether to implement it now or wait until the new tracker is released.
Hmm. I'm pretty sure it displays citations. @Kelly Stathis would know for sure but I haven't talked to her lately! Hopefully she sees this. :grinning:
Also, there's a bit of new related chatter over at #community > Make Data Count
Ok, it just that on the DataCite Usage Tracker (beta) documentation, only views and downloads are mentioned. I was wondering if citations were included since we did not request access to the beta :)
Huh. I see what you mean. I would suggest opening an issue at https://github.com/datacite/datacite-tracker/issues and asking if citations are supported.
The Usage Tracker is a means of collecting views and downloads. DataCite then processes these events into a usage report. This is an alternative to repositories generating usage reports themselves via log processing, which can be complicated to implement.
Views, downloads, and citations are all displayed in DataCite Commons and made available via our APIs. There is also the Data Metrics Badge: https://support.datacite.org/docs/displaying-usage-and-citations-in-your-repository which similarly displays all three.
Citation metadata can come from a variety of sources, including DataCite and Crossref DOI metadata. We're also expanding the sources of citations through the work on the Open Global Data Citation Corpus (https://makedatacount.org/data-citation/). However, citations can't be derived from web usage (the same way that, for example, views can be derived from page hits), so collecting citation information is not part of the usage tracker. I hope that helps to clarify the scope of the service!
Hi, @Kelly Stathis! Thanks and welcome back and happy new year!
Makes sense to me. Are you all set, @Gwenaรซl Doux?
@Kelly Stathis on a related note, at https://commons.datacite.org/repositories/x3oc4vr , the entry for Harvard Dataverse, it says 2578 citations. That's great! Can I easily see from the DataCite API or whatever, which DOI is most cited? Or even just a few DOIs that have any citations?
Thanks for this detailed explanation, great :+1: I misunderstood data retrieval and display. When I reread the doc and the google docs document, I realized that I got the 2 mixed up.
@Philip Durbin Yes! Here's a REST API request that sorts by citation count (descending):
https://api.datacite.org/dois/?client-id=gdcc.harvard-dv&sort=-citation-count
144 citations! Amazing! Thank you, Kelly!
Screenshot-2024-01-26-at-11.48.01-AM.png
It's a little surprising that https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/OHHUKH has the most (144) because it doesn't have any files. :thinking:
Maybe I'll start a new topic for this.
Over here: #community > top 25 cited datasets
Thanks again, @Kelly Stathis ! This is great!
Last updated: Nov 01 2025 at 14:11 UTC